tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32200954.post2569835222251286465..comments2023-07-04T15:59:50.489+01:00Comments on Martin Eaglestone: It has hit a big fan !Martin Eaglestonehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11583850541409297727noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32200954.post-12902413287668920952007-12-06T19:38:00.000+00:002007-12-06T19:38:00.000+00:00Want to buy some computer discs ? Going cheap !Want to buy some computer discs ? Going cheap !adolf moanshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15412264162216583590noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32200954.post-23202210500447082312007-12-04T18:35:00.000+00:002007-12-04T18:35:00.000+00:00I think the tone of the posting is how stupid to g...I think the tone of the posting is how stupid to get caught by rules we created. I don't see the argument for the taxpayer either, but if the union link etc is reduced then I think public funding is inevitable : all round.<BR/><BR/>I suppose all parties have to balance income against expenditure in the long term, I'm unclear why the £1million cap is necessary ?Martin Eaglestonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11583850541409297727noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32200954.post-23027231338580202582007-12-04T01:08:00.000+00:002007-12-04T01:08:00.000+00:00I see...there seems to be almost an indignant air ...I see...there seems to be almost an indignant air of..'It's not fair that we were caught cheating because we set the rules'... about the Labour party at the moment!<BR/><BR/>Coupled with...'The taxpayer must fund our bloated party staffing levels and apparatus because otherwise we are incapable of staying within the limits of the rules and law as it stands'<BR/><BR/><BR/>As you're about reforming the laws to suit your party's latest needs Martin may I be allowed to suggest that provision be made that no political party be allowed to go more than £1m in debt? <BR/><BR/><BR/>Thanks very much!K Mahoneyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01879280989821001864noreply@blogger.com